Share

Palo Alto CA Estate Planning Blog

Monday, April 15, 2013

Why You Should Name a Stand-Alone Retirement Trust as Beneficiary

 

Naming the right beneficiary for tax-deferred retirement accounts is critical. Most people want to continue the tax-deferred growth for as long as possible, pay the least amount in income taxes and get the maximum stretch-out. Required distributions after the owner dies will be based on the new beneficiary’s age and life expectancy, so the younger the beneficiary (like a child or grandchild), the longer the stretch out.

However, naming a beneficiary outright has several disadvantages. If the beneficiary is a minor, distributions will need to be paid to a guardian; if no guardian exists, one will have to be appointed by the court. An older beneficiary may be tempted to take larger distributions or even cash out the entire account, destroying your plans for continued tax-deferred growth. The money could be available to the beneficiary’s creditors, spouse and ex-spouse(s). There is the risk of court interference if your beneficiary becomes incapacitated, and the extra income could cause a beneficiary with special needs to lose government benefits. If your beneficiary is your spouse, he/she will be able to name a new beneficiary and is under no obligation to follow your wishes.

Naming a trust as beneficiary provides more control over, and protection for, these tax-deferred accounts. Ideally it is a separate trust designed specifically for this purpose; because it must meet certain requirements from the IRS, it’s best if it’s not part of a revocable living trust or other trust. For this reason, these trusts are often called “stand-alone retirement trusts.”

Required minimum distributions will be paid into the trust for the benefit of your beneficiary. The trust can either be mandated to then pay these distributions directly to the beneficiary (called a conduit trust) or it can accumulate these distributions (called an accumulation trust) and pay out trust assets according to your instructions (for example, for higher education expenses, down payment on a home, etc.)

Because a trust is the named beneficiary instead of the individual, no guardian is needed for minor children and there is no risk of court interference at the beneficiary’s incapacity. An accumulation trust will allow the trustee to receive the required distributions and use discretion to provide for a special needs beneficiary without jeopardizing government benefits.

Your beneficiary is prevented from cashing out or taking larger distributions, assuring the continuation of tax-deferred growth. If a conduit trust is used, distributions that are paid to the beneficiary (but not the account itself) would be subject to creditor claims. Thus, for maximum creditor protection, an accumulation trust is preferable.

Finally, successor beneficiaries can be named in the trust document, allowing you to keep control over who will receive the proceeds if your initial beneficiary should die before the account is fully paid out.

For more information about stand-alone retirement trusts, please contact my office.


Archived Posts

2015
2014
2013


Gadzo Law, P.C. assists clients throughout Santa Clara County, San Mateo County, Alameda County, San Francisco County, and Santa Cruz County and also in Palo Alto, Atherton, Portola Valley, Woodside, Los Altos, Mountain View, Sunnyvale, Menlo Park, Redwood City, Belmont, San Carlos, Burlingame, Cupertino, Saratoga, Los Gatos, Campbell and San Jose, California.



© 2019 Gadzo Law, P.C. | Disclaimer
220 State Street, Suite E, Los Altos, CA 94022
| Phone: 650-397-9300

Estate Planning | Advanced Estate Planning | Special Needs Planning | Probate / Estate Administration | Pet Trusts | Residential Real Estate | | Resources

FacebookLinked-In Company

Legal Website By
Zola Creative